14 février 2010
7
14
/02
/février
/2010
00:22
 | |||||
| Friday, February 12th, 2010, 9:11 pm Amman Time | |||||
| ||
|
|
Agencies
Syria fired a new round in its war of words with Israel on Thursday, saying Israel did not want Middle East peace and offering as evidence proposed tax breaks for Israelis living in the Golan Heights captured from Syria, Agence France-Presse reported.
The parliamentary vote on a bill providing tax breaks to settlers living in the Golan “is a new sign of the true intentions of Israel, which rejects peace”, a foreign ministry statement said.
“This is an illegal measure, which is added to a series of Israeli measures violating international law and UN resolutions considering null and void the Israel annexation of the Golan,” it added.
The statement said Israeli policy was a “permanent challenge” to those in the world that want a “just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East”, and called on the international community to act to put an end to that challenge.
On Wednesday, the Israeli parliament passed the first reading of a bill that would grant tax breaks to Golan residents, the same as other people in peripheral areas receive.
The bill requires two more readings to be adopted.
Israel captured the strategic Golan Heights in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed it in 1981.
Syria has always demanded the full return of the territory in any peace deal, right down to the shores of the Sea of Galilee, Israel’s main water source.
The last round of Turkish-mediated indirect peace talks between the two neighbours collapsed in 2008.
Israel and Syria have been in a verbal slanging match all month.
The latest spat emerged after Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak warned on February 1 that if there is no peace agreement with Syria, “we might find ourselves in a forceful conflict that could lead to an all-out war”.
Syria responded angrily, with its Foreign Minister Walid Mouallem telling Israel: “Do not test the power of Syria since you know the war will move into your cities”.
Barak later reiterated that “peace with Syria is a strategic objective” and tried to distance himself from the row, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also sought to ease tensions by stating Israel wants to renew talks with Damascus.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman also infuriated Damascus with a stark warning that any new conflict between the foes would lead to Syrian President Bashar Assad being removed from power.
Mouallem countered that Israel’s major cities would come under attack in any new war.
US ambassador
The Syrian government has approved a request by the United States to re-appoint an ambassador in Damascus after a five year break, Reuters reported on Thursday citing a pro-government Syrian newspaper.
“The approval was sent through the diplomatic channels to Washington,” Al Watan newspaper said on its website.
The United States pulled out its ambassador from Damascus in 2005 following the assassination in Beirut of Rafik Hariri, a Lebanese member of parliament and a former prime minister.
On February 3, the US State Department confirmed Washington had sent Damascus the name of a potential nominee, but no one was immediately available to comment on Al Watan report.
Syria’s foes in Lebanon accused Damascus of being behind the bombing and a UN investigation implicated Syrian security officials in the killing. Syria has denied any involvement.
Relations between Washington and Damascus improved after President Barack Obama took office in January last year. The State Department said in June that a new ambassador would be sent back to Damascus, without giving a date.
US Undersecretary of State William Burns, an architect of a 2003 deal between the United Sates and Libya that helped rehabilitate Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi, will visit Syria this month, diplomats in Damascus said.
No one was immediately available to comment at the Syrian foreign ministry to confirm approval had been granted.
Syria fired a new round in its war of words with Israel on Thursday, saying Israel did not want Middle East peace and offering as evidence proposed tax breaks for Israelis living in the Golan Heights captured from Syria, Agence France-Presse reported.
The parliamentary vote on a bill providing tax breaks to settlers living in the Golan “is a new sign of the true intentions of Israel, which rejects peace”, a foreign ministry statement said.
“This is an illegal measure, which is added to a series of Israeli measures violating international law and UN resolutions considering null and void the Israel annexation of the Golan,” it added.
The statement said Israeli policy was a “permanent challenge” to those in the world that want a “just and comprehensive peace in the Middle East”, and called on the international community to act to put an end to that challenge.
On Wednesday, the Israeli parliament passed the first reading of a bill that would grant tax breaks to Golan residents, the same as other people in peripheral areas receive.
The bill requires two more readings to be adopted.
Israel captured the strategic Golan Heights in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed it in 1981.
Syria has always demanded the full return of the territory in any peace deal, right down to the shores of the Sea of Galilee, Israel’s main water source.
The last round of Turkish-mediated indirect peace talks between the two neighbours collapsed in 2008.
Israel and Syria have been in a verbal slanging match all month.
The latest spat emerged after Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak warned on February 1 that if there is no peace agreement with Syria, “we might find ourselves in a forceful conflict that could lead to an all-out war”.
Syria responded angrily, with its Foreign Minister Walid Mouallem telling Israel: “Do not test the power of Syria since you know the war will move into your cities”.
Barak later reiterated that “peace with Syria is a strategic objective” and tried to distance himself from the row, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also sought to ease tensions by stating Israel wants to renew talks with Damascus.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman also infuriated Damascus with a stark warning that any new conflict between the foes would lead to Syrian President Bashar Assad being removed from power.
Mouallem countered that Israel’s major cities would come under attack in any new war.
US ambassador
The Syrian government has approved a request by the United States to re-appoint an ambassador in Damascus after a five year break, Reuters reported on Thursday citing a pro-government Syrian newspaper.
“The approval was sent through the diplomatic channels to Washington,” Al Watan newspaper said on its website.
The United States pulled out its ambassador from Damascus in 2005 following the assassination in Beirut of Rafik Hariri, a Lebanese member of parliament and a former prime minister.
On February 3, the US State Department confirmed Washington had sent Damascus the name of a potential nominee, but no one was immediately available to comment on Al Watan report.
Syria’s foes in Lebanon accused Damascus of being behind the bombing and a UN investigation implicated Syrian security officials in the killing. Syria has denied any involvement.
Relations between Washington and Damascus improved after President Barack Obama took office in January last year. The State Department said in June that a new ambassador would be sent back to Damascus, without giving a date.
US Undersecretary of State William Burns, an architect of a 2003 deal between the United Sates and Libya that helped rehabilitate Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi, will visit Syria this month, diplomats in Damascus said.
No one was immediately available to comment at the Syrian foreign ministry to confirm approval had been granted.
http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=23968
12 February 2010
Les articles et autres textes publiés ne reflètent pas obligatoirement les opinions de l'association "Comité Justice et Paix en Palestine et au Proche-Orient du 5ème (CJPP5)", qui dénie toute responsabilité dans leurs contenus, lesquels n'engagent que leurs auteurs ou leurs traducteurs. Nous sommes attentifs à toute proposition d'ajouts ou de corrections.
Le contenu de ce site peut être librement diffusé aux seules conditions suivantes, impératives : mentionner clairement l'origine des articles et autres textes, le nom du site et/ou du journal, ainsi que celui des traducteurs.
Partager cet article
